Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)
उत्तर
| p | q | r | ∼ p | ∼ p → q | p ∧ r | (∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r) |
| T | T | T | F | T | T | T |
| T | T | F | F | T | F | F |
| T | F | T | F | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | F | T | F | F |
| F | T | T | T | T | F | F |
| F | T | F | T | T | F | F |
| F | F | T | T | F | F | F |
| F | F | F | T | F | F | F |
The entries in the last column of the above truth table are neither all T nor all F.
∴ (∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r) is a contingency.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :
(p ∨ q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )
If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧ ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈ N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p ∧ q) → q
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.
Fill in the blanks :
Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Write the negation of the following statement.
∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∧ r
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Write the dual of the following.
(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
Write the dual of the following.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)
Write the dual of the following
(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)
Choose the correct alternative:
If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a
Write the dual of the following.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
