Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
उत्तर
Consider the statement pattern : [(p → q) ∧ q ] → p
No. of rows = 2n = 2 × 2 = 4
No. of column = m + n = 3 + 2 = 5
Thus the truth table of the given logical statement:
[(p → q) ∧ q] → p
| p | q | p → q | (p → q) ∧ q | [(p → q) ∧ q] → p |
| T | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | F | T |
| F | T | T | T | F |
| F | F | T | F | T |
The entries in the last column of the above truth table are neither all T nor all F.
∴ [(p → q) ∧ q] → p is contingency.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
Write the dual of the following statements:
Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈ N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7
Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)
(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)
Fill in the blanks :
Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
If he studies, then he will go to college.
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.
Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Choose the correct alternative:
If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
Write the dual of the following.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
