मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी विज्ञान (सामान्य) इयत्ता १२ वी

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency. (p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)

बेरीज

उत्तर

p q ∼ q p ↔ q p → ∼ q (p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
T T F T F F
T F T F T F
F T F F T F
F F T T T T

The entries in the last column of the above truth table are neither all T nor all F.
∴ (p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q) is a contingency.

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.2 [पृष्ठ १३]

APPEARS IN

व्हिडिओ ट्यूटोरियलVIEW ALL [1]

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) →  r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T


Write the dual of the following statements:

Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1


Write the negation of the following statement : 
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.


Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the dual of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∧ r


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Write the dual of the following.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)


Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


Complete the truth table.

p q r q → r r → p (q → r) ˅ (r → p)
T T T T `square` T
T T F F `square` `square`
T F T T `square` T
T F F T `square` `square`
F T T `square` F T
F T F `square` T `square`
F F T `square` F T
F F F `square` T `square`

The given statement pattern is a `square`


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Write the negation of the following statement:

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)


If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______


The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×