English

Write the dual of the following. 13 is prime number and India is a democratic country - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country

Sum

Solution

13 is prime number or India is a democratic country.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1.1: Mathematical Logic - Q.4

RELATED QUESTIONS

Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Write the negation of the following statement.

∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×