English

Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence. p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q

Sum

Solution

1 2 3 4 5 6
p q ~p ~p∨q p∧(~p∨q) p∧q
T T F T T T
T F F F F F
F T T T F F
F F T T F F

In the above truth table, the entries in columns 5 and 6 are identical.

∴ p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.14 | Page 33

RELATED QUESTIONS

Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Write the dual of the following statements:

Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈  N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7


Write the negation of the following statement : 
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Karina is very good or everybody likes her.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Write the dual of the following.

(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)


Write the dual of the following.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)


The false statement in the following is ______.


Choose the correct alternative:

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×