English

Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern. (p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)

Sum

Solution

p q r p∨r q∧r ~q∧r) (p∨r)→~(q ∧ r)
T T T T T F F
T T F T F T T
T F T T F T T
T F F T F T T
F T T T T F F
F T F F F T T
F F T T F T T
F F F F F T T
shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.11 | Page 33

RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Write the negation of the following statement.

∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

~(p ∨ q) → r


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

If he studies, then he will go to college.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.


Write the dual of the following.

(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)


Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.

Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______. 


Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:

(p→q)∧(p→r)


The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×