English

Show that the following statement pattern is contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p → r) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)

Sum

Solution

p q r p→q p→r (p→q)∧(p→r)
T T T T T T
T T F T F F
T F T F T F
T F F F F F
F T T T T T
F T F T T T
F F T T T T
F F F T T T

The truth values in the last column are not identical. Hence, it is contingency.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.6 [Page 16]

APPEARS IN

RELATED QUESTIONS

Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


If   p : It is raining
     q : It is humid

Write the following statements in symbolic form:

(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid. 


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency.  (p →  q) ∧  (p ∧ ~ q ).


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p ∨ ~ q


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.


Write the negation of the following statement.

∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Complete the truth table.

p q r q → r r → p (q → r) ˅ (r → p)
T T T T `square` T
T T F F `square` `square`
T F T T `square` T
T F F T `square` `square`
F T T `square` F T
F T F `square` T `square`
F F T `square` F T
F F F `square` T `square`

The given statement pattern is a `square`


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×