English

Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement. If a man is bachelor, then he is happy. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.

Sum

Solution

Let p: A man is bachelor

q: A man is happy

∴ The given statement is p → q

Its converse is q → p

If a man is happy then he is bachelor

Its inverse is ~p → ~q

If a man is not bachelor then he is not happy

Its contrapositive is ~q → ~p

If a man is not happy then he is not bachelor.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency.  (p →  q) ∧  (p ∧ ~ q ).


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)


Fill in the blanks :

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∧ r


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.


The false statement in the following is ______.


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______. 


Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:

(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)


The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×