Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.
Solution
13 is prime number or India is a democratic country.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :
(p ∨ q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
Write the dual of the following statements:
Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.
Write converse and inverse of the following statement:
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.”
If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧ ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )
If p : It is raining
q : It is humid
Write the following statements in symbolic form:
(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid.
Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :
(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈ N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7
Write the negation of the following statement :
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.
Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Fill in the blanks :
Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the negation of the following statement.
∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(p → r) ∧ q
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
~(p ∨ q) → r
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
If he studies, then he will go to college.
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.
Write the dual of the following.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)
Write the dual of the following.
~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q
Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.
Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.
Write the dual of the following
(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively
The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______.
The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .
- `bar(PR)`
- `bar(PM)`
- `bar(QM)`
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
